orangewise (nerdy stuff)

January 31, 2010

Google Labs Adds Search Icon To ‘Compose Mail’ Window In Gmail

Filed under: google, shared google feeds — feeds @ 7:12 PM

Orli Yakuel noticed that Google has quietly added a new icon in the ‘Compose Mail’ window of its free webmail service Gmail, enabling users to run search queries from within the interface and insert results and URLs straight into drafted e-mails or open chat conversations.

This is an expansion of a Google Labs feature, simply dubbed ‘Google Search’, that was introduced back in April 2009 as an optional setting in Gmail.

The first iteration of the labs feature added a ‘Web Search’ box next to the main column (left side on the screenshot) that provides much of the same functionality, only you needed to remember to go to the side column to run a search. Now, enabling the feature also adds an icon to the top toolbar in the ‘Compose Mail’ window, where you can also customize colors and fonts for your message, add links and emoticons and more.

It’s unclear when the icon was added, but we can’t retrieve any mention about this on the Gmail blog and today marks the first time we’ve seen it.

The icon opens up a search box at the bottom of your screen and lets you run a search like you would using the regular Google search interface. A small arrow opens up a limited menu where you can paste results, paste URL and send by e-mail (which is kind of redundant in this case, since you’re already in a new e-mail). If you have a chat conversation open in Gmail, you’ll also get an extra option to send search results to your contact.

Obviously, this isn’t a ground-breaking feature, but if you’re a Gmail user you might want to (re-)enable the Labs feature in Settings. Guaranteed to save you quite some time.

Your Ad Here




January 28, 2010

Oracle hails Java but kills Sun Cloud

Filed under: java, oracle, shared google feeds — feeds @ 1:04 AM

Oracle's plans for Java and the proposed Sun Cloud public computing platform became clearer Wednesday, with Oracle executives giving another big thumbs-up to Java but a thumbs-down to Sun Cloud.

Your Ad Here




January 27, 2010

Live Migration of EBS Services Using Oracle VM

Filed under: linux, shared google feeds — feeds @ 11:06 PM
[Editor: This is the fifth of a five-part series on virtualization and cloud topics from Ivo Dujmovic, an architect in our Applications Technology Integration group.]

Breaking news: you can now achieve live migration of E-Business Suite instances on Oracle VM (OVM).  This is the High Availability and Fault Tolerance Holy Grail.  In an environment configured to support live migration, end-user sessions running on one node in a virtual machine server can be migrated transparently to a different node on a different virtual machine server.  You have asked for this functionality for more than a dozen years and many Oracle partners offer solutions to achieve this.  After all these years, Oracle can provide you a solution for E-Business Suite environments using Oracle VM.

Why was this so hard for Oracle E-Business Suite?  Well, the short answer is that we have hundreds of products using many different technologies as part of the E-Business Suite, and many of them had complicated session state handling (some in the database, some on the middle-tier), caches that needed to be kept synchronized, and so on.  While all technical problems are soluble, this one was just not feasible to solve within E-Business Suite itself. 


Architecture diagram showing failover of virtual server in an HA-enabled server pool
Virtualization Changes Things

In an conventional (non-virtualized) architecture, the failure of a specific application tier node would force a logout of all end-users with sessions on that particular node.  Any transactions that were mid-stream on that application tier node would have been lost.  On a virtualized platform, end-user sessions can be migrated from one machine to another without the end-user noticing. 

OVM's live migration feature has some requirements, including the need to have look-alike machines on same subnet.  These requirements are discussed in detail in:
Oracle VM also currently restarts the VM if the Virtual Machine Server fails, which would mean the end-user session does need to be restarted. We expect that these behaviors should improve over time.

In addition to the great live migration feature, OVM also has cloning functionality, which work seamlessly work if you use our EBS templates or virtualization kit.

Your Feedback is Welcome

This concludes my mini-series on virtualization and the E-Business Suite.  We're extremely interested in hearing about your use cases and your experiences with our new templates and virtualization kit.  Tell us what you think via our new OVM Templates discussion forum.

References
Related Articles
Your Ad Here




Apple Launches iPad

Filed under: shared google feeds — feeds @ 8:33 PM
Apple today introduced iPad, a revolutionary device for browsing the web, reading and sending email, enjoying photos, watching videos, playing games, reading e-books, and much more. Its high-resolution Multi-Touch display lets you interact with content — including 12 innovative new apps designed especially for iPad and almost all of the 140,000 apps available on the App Store. At just 0.5 inches thick and 1.5 pounds, iPad is thinner and lighter than any laptop or notebook. iPad will be available in March starting at the breakthrough price of just $499.
Your Ad Here




January 26, 2010

Google Voice Does An End Run Around Apple And Shows Up In The iPhone’s Browser (Screenshots)

Filed under: google, shared google feeds — feeds @ 3:00 PM

Remember the dustup last summer over Apple’s rejection of the Google Voice app for the iPhone? Everyone was pointing fingers and even the FCC got involved. Michael was so upset that he quit the iPhone rather than give up his Google Voice. Well, now he can come back because Google Voice is finally on the iPhone via its browser, and Apple can’t really do anything about it..

Google Voice will become available today for both the iPhone and Palm Pre/Pixi via a new mobile Website which will go live later today at http://m.google.com/voice. The new Google Voice mobile site shows your inbox with transcribed calls, which you can play from the browser. You can also send SMS messages or dial from the browser. The application ends up making a local call through your cell phone to Google Voice, which then routes your call through its own lines. When someone gets the call, they see your Google Voice number instead of your AT&T number. And when you get a voicemail, a notification even pops up on your iPhone with the transcribed message (through SMS).

It is built on HTML5 with most of the functionality of the original iPhone app, except that it cannot access the local contact list in your iPhone’s address book. It lets you manage a separate Google Voice contact list which is kept in the cloud instead. Google Voice voice routes your calls through its servers and acts as a new hub through which you can manage calls and forward them to various phones. You can also manage your settings and various phone numbers. The HTML5 makes it very fast, allows for local caching of data, and supports the voice tags necessary to play the audio voicemails through the browser.

Mobile apps like Google Voice really show what can be done in the browser and point to an alternative way to build sophisticated apps for the iPhone without going through the gatekeepers in Cupertino. VoiceCentral, one of the third-party Google Voice apps that was also pulled from the App store, created a similar browser-based version of Google Voice for the iPhone. Both of these apps went the browser route because they didn’t have any other choice, but you can hardly tell them apart from regular apps. Once mobile phones allow access to deeper phone functions such as the local contact list from the browser, there will be even less reason to create a device specific app. The Web, after all, supports many different platforms. With a few tweaks to the UI, the mobile Google Voice site also works on Palm phones.

Your Ad Here




Keep an eye on changing pages

Filed under: shared google feeds — feeds @ 3:58 AM

Google just launched a nice feature on Google Reader: the ability to keep an eye on pages for changes. This works even if the page doesn’t have its own RSS feed. This sort of thing is very handy. You could use it to spot new things on a privacy policy page or watch for changes in the executives page at another search engine.

Check out the blog post, but it’s easy to use: just add any url to Google Reader.

Your Ad Here




January 21, 2010

Google Wave Adds Access Permissions [Collaboration]

Filed under: google, shared google feeds — feeds @ 7:30 PM

One of the most-needed missing features in the Google Wave preview rolls out this week: user access permissions.

Now, rather than everyone being able to edit everyone else's blips in a total free-for-all, the creator of a wave can add users and groups and give them either full access to edit everything, or read-only access. The binary choice is still too limiting, but GOOG says that "Reply only" access is on its way.

To limit a contact's access to a blip you created, click on their icon on the top of the wave and choose "Read only" from the drop-down, as shown. You can give both individual users and groups read-only access; though individual access permissions trump that of the groups. (For example, if the public group has read-only access, you can grant a single user full access to edit, even though that person's part of the group.) You can only set permissions for waves you have created.

Along with this first iteration of access permissions, the Wave team also added a "Restore" button to Wave's playback feature. If a wave gets destroyed beyond easy repair, you can use playback to roll it back to a former version of itself.

Even though this means quite a bit of revision to the book, it's great to see Wave evolving into something much more usable. I've also updated the Wave vs. the Rest chart to reflect this new feature.

New features: Read-only and Restore [Google Wave Blog via Smarterware]
Smarterware is Lifehacker editor emeritus Gina Trapani's new home away from 'hacker. To get all of the latest from Smarterware, be sure to subscribe to the Smarterware RSS feed. For more, check out Gina's weekly Smarterware feature here on Lifehacker.

Your Ad Here




EU Approves $7.4 Billion Deal Between Oracle And Sun

Filed under: oracle, shared google feeds — feeds @ 11:49 AM

It’s official: the European Commission has granted regulatory approval for Oracle to acquire Sun Microsystems for approximately $7.4 billion, without further conditions. In a statement released moments ago, Oracle says it expects unconditional approval from China and Russia as well and intends to close the transaction shortly.

Oracle will host an all-day live event for customers, partners, press and analysts on January 27th, 2010 at 9:00 AM Pacific time at its headquarters in Redwood Shores, California.

Just in case you weren’t planning on attending or following the major Apple event.

The approval comes after an in-depth antitrust investigation opened in September amid concerns that Oracle’s acquisition of MySQL would stifle competition in the database market. In August 2009, the Departement of Justice had already given the deal green light.

From the press release:

The Commission’s in-depth investigation showed that although MySQL and Oracle compete in certain parts of the database market, they are not close competitors in others, such as the high-end segment.

Given the open source nature of MySQL, the Commission also assessed Oracle’s ability and incentive to remove the constraint exerted by MySQL after the merger and the extent to which this constraint could, if necessary, be replaced by other actors on the database market.

“I am now satisfied that competition and innovation will be preserved on all the markets concerned. Oracle’s acquisition of Sun has the potential to revitalize important assets and create new and innovative products,” said Neelie Kroes, the European antitrust commissioner.

The database market is highly concentrated with the three main proprietary database vendors – Oracle, IBM and Microsoft – accounting for approximately 85% of the market in terms of revenue, the commission added.

Your Ad Here




January 19, 2010

Memeo Connect Launches, Brings Desktop Sync To Google Apps

Filed under: google, shared google feeds — feeds @ 9:02 PM

Last week, Google announced a new feature for Google Docs that may be the closest thing to the fabled GDrive that we may ever get: the ability to upload and store any kind of file to your Google Docs account. This is a big deal, because it allows you to use Google as a storage service for the first time. But Google only went half way — they let you store the documents, but they didn’t actually build any desktop clients to help you sync them. For that, Google teamed with a handful of third parties. Today sees the launch of the most interesting of those: a desktop syncing client called Memeo Connect that lets you manage your Google Docs account from your desktop, giving you offline access to your Google Docs and making it easy to sync your files across multiple computers.

Most people probably aren’t very familiar with Memeo, but there’s a good chance you’ve come across one of their products at some point — the company makes the local backup software that comes with most external hard drives. But Memeo has also recently been offering some cloud-based file transfer services, which is probably why Google approached them last year about building a local client for the upcoming Google Docs storage feature. Memeo has built native applications for Mac and Windows (both of which are available today), and the service will cost $9/user per year. That’s on top of the $50/year fee you pay Google to become a Premier account holder (which you need to upload files).

Getting started with the service is simple. After entering your Google Apps credentials, the application will quickly download local versions of each of the documents that you’ve already stored in your Google Docs account (you’ll see a ’synced’ message under each as they complete). And you can quickly add locally stored files on your computer to your Google Docs account by simply dragging and dropping them onto the app.

For the most part, navigation is intuitive: at the left hand side of the screen are filters that let you choose which kind of file you’re looking for, be it a presentation, spreadsheet, document, or ‘other’, and there’s a search box if you know the file name. Clicking on a file will show you a list of other users with access to that document via Google Docs sharing functionality, and there’s a pane that displays any local revisions of the document. The application also respects the navigation features offered by Google Docs, like Starred document, and shared folders.

My biggest gripe with the service is one that isn’t really Memeo’s fault (it’s also a bit confusing, so bear with me). Using Memeo Connect with Google Docs, your documents can be stored in one of two ways: as an online editable Google Doc, or as a Microsoft Office document (PPT, DOC, etc.). If you sync a Word document from your desktop, it will be initially stored in the Microsoft Word format. You can view this document from any computer, but in order to make changes you’ll have to download it and edit it with Microsoft Word.

That is, unless you decide to convert that Word Document to a Google Doc. This is very easy to do from Memeo Connect —  you simply right-click the document and tell it to convert, which takes a few seconds. There are plenty of benefits from doing this: you’ll be able to use Google Docs’ collaborative features, and you can edit the document from any computer with online connectivity, regardless of if it has Word installed. But it has some downsides too, namely that you’ll probably lose some of the document’s formatting, which is going to be a deal-breaker for essential documents.

In other words, while Memeo Connect makes it very easy to make sure you’ve always got the most up to date files with you, there’s a good chance you won’t always be able to tap into the collaborative cloud-based features offered by Google Docs. Again, this isn’t Memeo’s fault (it has more to do with Microsoft’s proprietary formats than anything). It’s just something to be aware of.

One other gripe I have with the service is that you can’t currently monitor your local Documents folder and automatically upload any new documents to your Google account. Memeo Director of Business Development Spencer Chen says that this is actually in the experimental stages, so we’ll likely be seeing this in an update soon.

Memeo Connect does a good job complimenting Google Docs, despite my complaints. The question that seems to be on everyone’s mind, though, is whether or not this is going to kill off other file syncing services, like Dropbox (which we’re huge fans of). Chen says that he doesn’t see Memeo Connect as being directly competitive with Dropbox — he says they serve different markets and needs, with Google Docs/Memeo Connect helping with enterprise/office productivity and collaboration, while Dropbox is file syncing for consumers. Instead, he sees Memeo as being more directly competitive with Box.net. I know plenty of companies who use Dropbox for business purposes (TechCrunch included), but it’s clear that the Google Docs integration will have appeal to the enterprise space.

As part of the launch, Memeo is offering 20 TechCrunch readers a chance to win a free year subscription. To enter, go to this page, hit ‘Try Now’, and include “TC” in the comment field. The company will randomly select 20 winners from the entries.

Other services that offer services that work with the new Google Docs fuctionality include Syncplicity and Manymoon.

Information provided by CrunchBase

Your Ad Here




January 18, 2010

Twitter.com vs The Twitter Ecosystem

Filed under: shared google feeds — feeds @ 1:03 PM

John Borthwick, co-founder of Betaworks, parent company to bit.ly, twitterfeed, tweetdeck, chartbeat, and many other interesting web services, posted yesterday on "Ongoing tracking of the real time web …

Through these various Betaworks companies, John and the team have access to a tremendous amount of data and if you are interested in this subject, you really should read John's post.

I develop many of my theses based on what I see happening on this blog. And I've been seeing something on this blog that has gotten my attention.

Traffic is way up to this blog in the first half of January. This blog has seen as many visits in the first half of January as a normal month.

Sitemeter stats

So I went to Google Analytics to find out why. And I didn't see anything particularly new and different in the first half of this month.

Goog analytics
 

But that direct number bugs me so I sent John an email to see what I could learn. The first thing I learned is that he was planning a post (link above) on this exact topic. And he sent me some data on the clicks to avc.com from bit.ly in the first half of January. Here's a snapshot from John's email to me:

Email from john
 

Now, where would google analytics be capturing those 35,147 clicks? Well Twitter.com for sure. But that's only 7,567. Could the other ~28,000 clicks be in the "direct" number? I am absolutely positive that a bunch of them are.

But think about this for a second. Of the 35,000 clicks I got from bit.ly in the first half of January, only 20% of them came from Twitter.com. So exactly how big is Twitter.com vs the Twitter ecoystem?

Well, let's go back to John's post and pull my favorite chart out of it:

Twitt+eco
 

John's chart estimates that Twitter.com is about 20mm uvs a month in the US (comScore has it at 60mm uvs worldwide) and the Twitter ecosystem at about 60mm uvs in the US.

That says that across all web services, not just AVC, the Twitter ecosystem is about 3x Twitter.com. And on this blog, whose audience is certainly power users, that ratio is 5x.

Just to double check, because this is a seriously big deal, I checked all the links I bit.ly "ized" this past 30 days. Here's where they were clicked on:

Bit

So the links I put out into Twitter in the past 30 days generated almost 39,000 clicks. Nice. But only 10,000 of those clicks happened on Twitter.com. The rest happened elsewhere in the Twitter ecosystem, including Facebook which is part of the Twitter ecosystem when they showcase a post that is generated on Twitter, as all of mine are.

So that's a 4x ratio. That's a good double check. Whether its 3x (John's post), 4x (my links), or 5x (incoming traffic to AVC), it is clear that there's a big difference between the two.

My point is this. You can talk about Twitter.com and then you can talk about the Twitter ecosystem. One is a web site. The other is a fundamental part of the Internet infrastructure. And the latter is 3-5x bigger than the former and that delta is likely to grow even larger. 

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Your Ad Here




Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress